| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
- Uncategorized (338)
- 16. May 2012: How Romney Can Win
- 14. May 2012: The Problem with Paul
- 7. May 2012: The Joy of "Stealing Votes"
- 2. May 2012: Onward, Libertarian Soldiers
- 2. May 2012: How Ron Paul Could Still Win and Why No One Will Know for Sure Until August
- 16. April 2012: Revolution is Brewing in Minnesota
- 27. March 2012: Libertarian Fascists, and Other Bits of Foolishness
- 21. March 2012: Jack Welch, the Market, and Ron Paul
- 20. March 2012: Brokered Convention-->President (Rand) Paul?
- 16. March 2012: Ron Paul is the Candidate from Below
Sarah Palin: F*cking Idiot
Okay, okay–So the title of this post may not exactly exude scholarly decorum, but then again, neither does its subject: the purely, prodigiously, and putrefactorily pea-brained Sarah Palin. In this local news clip from her *gasp!* possible presidential campaign trail (!), she once again exposes herself as the absolutely ignorant, stooge of a stateswoman that she is. Not knowing a damned thing of substance about American history, she tries to make up for it with utterly platitudinous descriptions of Paul Revere’s ride, to truly pathetic effect. Perhaps those potential Sarah voters who see this video will reconsider voting for this particular sham of a person and will instead vote for the only person left in our government with a both a conscience AND a brain (Ron Paul, of course), but I doubt it–they’re all just as stupid. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be Palin-Patriots, they would have been Paulitarians from the start. But, just in case they can be swayed from the extreme error of their ways: Who do you think Paul Revere would have voted for?–The woman who obviously doesn’t care about the Revolutionary heritage because it mucks up her ignorance (*ahem*) faith-based approach to government, or the man who upholds Enlightenment–a.k.a. American Revolutionary–ideals of limited government and rationality-based secularism in public affairs?