Why White Nationalists are Anti-Market (and Anti-Ron Paul)

Give a listen to this clip of two despicable white nationalists (repetition, I know) gabbing on the radio (presumably) about why Ron Paul should be rejected by their comrades in hate.  Their reasons:  he wants ‘a sound, functioning economy for the brown people.’  Yes, he’s pro-sound money and anti-war as well as pro-free market, so he is to be detested.  Why, exactly?  Because sound money, no militarism, and free markets would lead to the greatest advancements for all races–not simply whites–since the Industrial Revolution, and racists simply can’t have that.  Pay close attention to why they are anti-free market, most especially.  They say that the essence of racism is preferring “your own” to “aliens,” and the free market favors, first and foremost, the consumer–ALL consumers.  Regardless of color, Ron Paul’s version of a free market would tear racism to pieces, scattering pockets of white nationalists to the corners of the Earth, never to reclaim even the tiniest bit of their 18th-century white paradise.  I’ve said it many times before and I’ll say it again–Ron Paul and libertarianism are the very best choices available to minorities precisely because they are the most individualist choices a person can make, politically and philosophically.  Libertarians don’t see people as groups, but individuals, and markets don’t see individuals, but their millions of choices and preferences, color-blind to all of them.

One Response to “Why White Nationalists are Anti-Market (and Anti-Ron Paul)”

  1. WFTRA says:

    i wish he was the republican nominee.
    i mean, he’d have my vote.
    why do people keep picking fluffballs and figureheards over someone with real ideas ***real ideas that he will actually follow through on. i see his name all over the forums and comments sections, but where is his support in the republican party? why is he not the nominee? why do people favor the false prophet candidates instead?

Leave a Reply